Ford Engineers Strap Giant Water Cannon To Volvo

Stel hier alle niet-technische Volvo-zaken aan de orde. Technische vragen stel je in de rubriek van het betreffende model.
Plaats reactie
Gebruikersavatar
liquid_force
6th Gear member
Berichten: 4695
Lid geworden op: 12.11.2005 - 19:18
Locatie: Zürich

Afbeelding

Ford engineers have rigged a giant water cannon to a Volvo V70R to test effects of a side-impact crash without the crash. Better news? Ben's trying out this Carpocalypse-level technology as we speak. More below.

Using a Martin Engineering Hurricane Cannon, the test driver can pilot the car as normal and, with the push of a button, simulate the force of a car striking the back of the car. They then take the test data back, plug it into the computer, and devise new ways to tweak the stability control. Blah, blah blah.

Afbeelding

Afbeelding

Afbeelding

Afbeelding

Afbeelding

We think this would be an awesome car-to-car weapon. Imagine someone in another car is trying to run you off the road with a PIT maneuver but, as they approach, you let the water cannon knock them into the ditch. This is the kind of fun you get to have when you're not encumbered by bankruptcy, we guess.
From Pumpkin Patch to Test Track
Ford researchers also use a water cannon test to analyze how a moving vehicle reacts to being struck from the side, without putting test vehicles and drivers at risk of damage or injury. Researchers say the new test could prove useful in the development of next-generation stability control technology.

In this highly coordinated maneuver, Ford engineers mount an air-powered cannon – a tool commonly used in mining operations and pumpkin-throwing contests – in the rear compartment of a test vehicle. The cannon blasts water outward, causing a recoil impulse that forces the vehicle into a skid. Engineers use the test data in computer simulations to help study how to enhance stability control technology, reducing risks to test drivers and damage to test vehicles.

"It's a very effective test that demonstrates the ingenuity of our engineering team to think outside the box," said Jeff Rupp, manager, Ford Active Safety Systems Engineering. "We know of no other automaker doing anything quite like it."

According to the 2008 New Vehicle Customer Study, safety features account for one of the top ten reasons why Ford buyers chose their vehicle. More than 53 percent of Ford buyers indicated that safety features are "extremely important" in their decision to purchase a Ford vehicle.

"Ford's efforts to advance vehicle safety are driving more car buyers to the brand," said Mike Harper, brand and tracking manager, Ford Market Research. "And their interest in safety continues to fuel innovation among our vehicle designers and engineers."
bron: Jalopnik.com
Gebruikersavatar
Paul
Geartronic member
Berichten: 33123
Lid geworden op: 19.09.2004 - 00:38

Wat zonde van die R, hadden ze daar niet gewoon een 2.4 voor kunnen gebruiken?
MY08 C30 1.6D Summum / MY09 C30 1.6D DrivE Sport / MY11 V50 D2 / MY13 C30 D2 R-Edition / MY16 V40 D2 R-Design / MY14 V60 D6 Plug-in-Hybrid Ice White /MY16 V70 D4 Polar+ Magic Blue / MY17 V60 D5 Twin Engine Special Edition Ice White / MY13 C30 D2 R-Edition / MY19 V90 T4 Business Sport / MY20 E-Golf
MY20 XC60 T4 Polestar Engineered R-Design / MY23 XC40 Pure Electric Plus

MY23 Polestar 2 Snow, Pilot, 20inch
MY24.5 XC40 Pure Electric Ultra
Gebruikersavatar
Ben
Executive Member
Berichten: 41004
Lid geworden op: 09.09.2004 - 16:57
Locatie: Even ten noorden van de Paltz
Contacteer:

Wat een jojo's
hebben ze niks beters te doen bij Ford ;-)


Edit
:oops: ik zie nu pas dat het geen speeltje is maar dat ze er serieus mee testen.
Volvohistorie: 244-245-440-850-V70-V70-S60-XC70-XC70-245-S70-V70
M@rcel
6th Gear member
Berichten: 4457
Lid geworden op: 19.03.2009 - 13:07

Slim bekeken. En de "R" zal wel gedaan zijn omdat daarop de meest geavanceerde stability control aanwezig is.

Deze testen uitvoeren door middel van "echte crashes" is:
- minder consistent, minder reproduceerbaar
- minder veilig
- duurder

Met name de reproduceerbaarheid van een impact lijkt me belangrijk om afstellingsverschillen in de stability control goed te kunnen meten/ervaren.
Plaats reactie

Terug naar “Volvo algemeen (niet technisch)”